> Sometimes I think Endnote is a bit more of a librarian tool, whereas some of the other products are more useful for researchers > Many other considerations I know (Marie has touched on some of them below) Can try it free for 30 days and the ease of use is very pleasing Also has nice PDF highlighting / note added and you can see all of these separately in a Summary report. Citations give a Cited By link (via GS) and can add new citations to a library directly within the product. > Paperpile is again cloud based, capture citations very easily via button that appears in PubMed, Google Scholar etc results. > SciWheel is cloud based, offers browser extension for citation capture and has a very nice PDF or web page highlighting or note taking option, with a summary of the highlights / notes available next to the citation > Have played with a couple of other options: PDF annotation highlighting / commenting is a bit limited compared to some competitors While possible, using it on more than one computer again seems rather clunky and fraught compared to cloud-based options Capturing citations (via export / import) seems quite clunky compared to the much more streamlined approach that some other systems (via browser extension or button that appears in search results) > We use Endnote but there are a few things that I think aren't that ideal with it: > On Oct 12, 2022, at 1:21 AM, Rob Penfold wrote: ![]() ![]() University of the Incarnate Word - Brooks City BaseĤ301 Broadway CPO #121, San Antonio, TX 78209 We tell people about Endnote online, Mendeley and Zotero but we don’t pay for any of those. Re: Question about Citation Management Software
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |